November 2024
Updated: July 2025

Should I build my own large language model (LLM)?

Organizations considering building their own large language models (LLMs) should weigh the benefits of control and specialisation against challenges like high computational needs and expertise requirements.
article splash

The question "Should we build our own LLM?" reveals a fundamental misunderstanding of what most organisations actually need. After architecting AI systems that exploit advanced capabilities like hierarchical context management and self-improving workflows, the real question isn't whether to build an LLM—it's whether you're maximising the technical potential of AI solutions that already exist.

The real problem: most AI products use 20% of what's possible

Whilst organisations debate building custom LLMs, they're missing the bigger opportunity. The majority of AI implementations barely scratch the surface of available capabilities. Companies spend months building basic chatbots when they could be developing sophisticated systems with guided user journeys, contextual memory, and adaptive learning patterns.

Building your own LLM is like manufacturing your own microprocessors when you haven't yet mastered software architecture.

When building makes strategic sense

Custom LLM development becomes viable when you meet these criteria:

Technical Prerequisites:

  • Sophisticated AI development team with deep ML expertise
  • Substantial computational infrastructure (multi-million pound investment)
  • Access to high-quality, domain-specific training datasets
  • 18-24 month development timeline without revenue pressure

Business Justification:

  • Unique domain requirements that no existing model addresses
  • Data sovereignty regulations requiring complete control
  • Long-term competitive advantage dependent on proprietary AI capabilities
  • Volume economics where custom development becomes cost-effective

Most organisations claiming these prerequisites are overestimating their needs and underestimating the complexity.

The sophisticated alternative: maximising existing potential

Instead of building from scratch, focus on exploiting the full technical potential of available AI capabilities:

Advanced implementation approaches:

  • Hierarchical context management for complex decision-making workflows
  • Self-improving prompting systems that evolve with usage patterns
  • Novel interaction patterns that transform how users engage with AI
  • Multi-agent architectures that coordinate specialised AI capabilities

Strategic technical decisions:

  • Fine-tuning open-source models for specific domains
  • Implementing retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) with sophisticated knowledge graphs
  • Building custom evaluation frameworks for domain-specific performance
  • Developing hybrid approaches that combine multiple AI capabilities

Due diligence questions

Before making any LLM investment decision:

  1. Technical assessment: What percentage of available AI capabilities does your current implementation exploit?
  2. Competitive analysis: Could sophisticated implementation of existing models provide the same competitive advantage?
  3. Resource evaluation: Do you have the technical expertise to distinguish between superficial and genuine AI innovation?
  4. Strategic alignment: Does custom LLM development align with your core business capabilities and competitive positioning?

The investment reality

Building production-ready LLMs requires:

  • £2-10M+ in computational resources
  • 12-18 months with expert ML team
  • Ongoing operational costs exceeding £100K monthly
  • Risk of technological obsolescence as the field rapidly evolves

Most organisations would generate superior returns investing these resources in sophisticated implementation of existing capabilities.

Strategic recommendation

For 95% of organisations, the answer is clear: Don't build your own LLM. Build AI products that fully exploit what's already possible.

Focus on:

  • Product definition: Bridging ambitious vision with technical reality
  • Sophisticated architecture: Implementing advanced capabilities most competitors ignore
  • Strategic implementation: Creating competitive advantage through technical depth, not custom models

The organisations succeeding with AI aren't those building custom LLMs—they're those maximising the potential of existing capabilities whilst their competitors implement basic chatbots.

Getting strategic clarity

The LLM decision requires technical due diligence that distinguishes between solutions that exploit AI's full potential and those representing typical shallow implementations. This isn't a technology decision—it's a strategic business decision requiring expertise in both advanced AI capabilities and competitive positioning.

Before committing resources to custom LLM development, ensure you're not missing opportunities to create breakthrough products with existing technologies. The most sophisticated AI implementations often involve no custom model development whatsoever.


Need expert evaluation of your AI strategy and technical approaches? Schedule a call with us to discuss technical due diligence for AI investments and strategic guidance for building sophisticated AI products that maximise available capabilities.

Ready to exploit AI's full potential in your organisation?
If you're questioning whether to build a custom LLM when your existing AI implementations aren't yet leveraging advanced capabilities like hierarchical context management or multi-agent architectures, you need strategic technical guidance.

Our AI Innovation Assessment is designed for organisations at this critical decision point:
  • Email us now if you'd like an expert evaluation of your current AI implementation against its technical potential.
  • Book an initial consultation if you're ready to discuss developing sophisticated AI products that create competitive advantage through technical depth rather than custom model development.
Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter for insights on the latest developments in AI
No more than one newsletter a month