April 2025

The Non-Executive Director's guide to assessing AI system performance

The guide equips Non-Executive Directors with essential frameworks and insights to effectively assess AI system performance, ensuring alignment with corporate objectives and ethical standards.
article splash

In the contemporary business landscape, Artificial Intelligence (AI) has swiftly transcended its role as a technological novelty to become a cornerstone of strategic decision-making. As organisations increasingly integrate AI into their operations, Non-Executive Directors (NEDs) find themselves at the helm of overseeing these AI initiatives. This guide aims to empower NEDs with the necessary insights and tools to effectively assess the performance of AI systems, ensuring alignment with corporate objectives and ethical standards.

Understanding AI System Performance

AI system performance can be encapsulated by four critical dimensions: accuracy, efficiency, scalability, and reliability. These elements form the backbone of any robust AI deployment. Key performance indicators (KPIs) such as precision, recall, F1 score, and throughput serve as quantifiable measures of an AI system’s effectiveness. Crucially, these metrics must be meticulously aligned with the overarching business objectives to ensure that AI systems not only perform well technically but also deliver tangible business value.

Framework for Assessment

A structured framework for evaluating AI systems is imperative for informed oversight. This framework comprises three core components:

  • Data Quality: The bedrock of AI accuracy lies in the quality of data it consumes. High-quality, relevant data is essential for training models that perform reliably in real-world scenarios.
  • Model Evaluation: Techniques such as cross-validation and A/B testing are instrumental in rigorously assessing model performance. These methodologies help in identifying potential weaknesses and areas for improvement.
  • Continuous Monitoring: Establishing ongoing checks and updates is vital for maintaining AI performance over time and adapting to changing conditions.

Ethical and Governance Considerations

Ethics play a pivotal role in AI performance assessment. NEDs must ensure that AI systems are free from bias, transparent in their operations, and accountable for their outcomes. Implementing governance frameworks that align with regulatory standards and organisational policies is essential for ensuring ethical AI deployment and mitigating risks.

Engaging with AI Experts

Collaboration between NEDs and AI specialists is paramount. Effective communication and alignment on performance metrics facilitate informed decision-making. Building a culture of trust and transparency around AI initiatives not only enhances performance assessment but also fosters innovation and ethical compliance.

Conclusion

Non-Executive Directors play a critical role in assessing AI performance, ensuring that AI systems align with business and ethical goals. As AI continues to shape the future of business decision-making, NEDs are encouraged to embrace AI assessment as a strategic priority. This proactive approach will not only safeguard their organisations against AI-related risks but also unlock new opportunities for innovation and growth.

Subscribe to our newsletter
Join our newsletter for insights on the latest developments in AI
No more than one newsletter a month